The People of The State of California v. Alfred McZeal

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20248:24-cv-00089California353 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Case No. 8:24-cv-00089-JWH-JDE

CALIFORNIA,

12 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO Plaintiff, ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR 13 COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. v. § 1455(b)(4) 14

ALFRED MCZEAL, JR,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 On December 13, 2023, the People of the State of California filed in Orange County Superior Court and served upon Defendant Alfred McZeal, Jr., acriminal misdemeanor complaint for violating Tustin City Code § 5502(m)(3); 4|| McZeal’s arraignment was set for January 17, 2024. On January 16, 2024— one 5|| day before he was scheduled to be arraigned —McZeal removed this action to 6|| this Court, asserting federal question jurisdiction.* 7 Pursuant to federal removal statutes, the removal of criminal matters is 8 || permitted only for cases against federal officers or agencies or members of the 9|| armed forces as defendants. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 & 1442a. When a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.