Eric Stanton-Hoyle v. Jacob Scialdone

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20242:23-cv-03304California4,820 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On May 1, 2023, plaintiff Eric Stanton-Hoyle filed this action against defendants Jacob Scialdone, individually and d/b/a ExtractEx, Inc. & RSG710, Inc; Aaron Green, individually & d/b/a ExtractEx, Inc. & d/b/a t/a RSG710, Inc.; RSG710, Inc.; ExtractEx, Inc.; ExtractEx Consulting LLC: and Does 1 through 100, inclusive. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff asserted two claims for relief against defendants: (1) breach of contract and (2) fraud. Id. On December 15, 2023, plaintiff filed a joint stipulation for leave of court to file a first amended complaint as to defendants Jacob Scialdone, Aaron Green, and RSG710, Inc., which the Court granted that same day. Dkts. 28, 29. On January 23, 2024, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (the “FAC”). Dkt. 32. Plaintiff names defendants Jacob Scialdone, individually & d/b/a RSG710, Inc; Aaron Green, individually & d/b/a RSG710, Inc.; RSG710, Inc.; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, and asserts eight claims for relief against them: (1) breach of contract; (2) fraud — intentional misrepresentation; (3) securities fraud — violations of California Corporations Code; (4) concealment; (5) breach of fiduciary duty; (6)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.