Alexander Mee v. VisionTrack, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No. CV 24-2563-JFW(Ex) Date: April 11, 2024 Title: Alexander Mee -v- VisionTrack, Inc., et al.
PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD
NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION
On February 21, 2024, Plaintiff Alexander Mee (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendants VisonTrack, Inc. (“VT, Inc.”) and VisionTrack Limited (“VT Limited”) (collectively, “Defendants”). On March 28, 2024, VT, Inc. filed a Notice of Removal, alleging that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See Bender v. Williamsport Area School District, 475 U.S. 534, 541…