Supra National Express, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20242:24-cv-01593California1,297 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPRA NATIONAL EXPRESS, INC., Case No. 2:24-cv-01593-SB-KS Plaintiff, v. ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR

LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P. JURISDICTION

et al., Defendants. In this truck-leasing dispute, Plaintiff Supra National Express, Inc. filed this action in Los Angeles Superior Court against Defendants Penske Truck Leasing, Co., L.P., Christopher Wilson, and Junior Castro alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent interference with prospective economic benefit, and violations of California Business and Professions Code § 17200. Dkt. No. 1-2. Defendant Penske removed the case based on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Dkt. No. 1. Because Supra National is a California citizen and Castro and Wilson are also California citizens, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the case so long as Castro and Wilson are in it. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996) (defining complete diversity under § 1332(a)). In its notice of removal, Penske argued that the Court should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.