Brian T. Hill v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20242:19-cv-08989California1,414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN T. HILL, Case No. CV 19-8989-MWF(JC)

Plaintiff, ORDER (1) ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE IN PART; (2) DENYING

JIM BONNIFIELD, et al., PLAINTIFF’S VARIOUS

REQUESTS; AND (3) DISMISSING

Defendants. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

17 The procedural history of this case is lengthy and somewhat complicated due primarily to Plaintiff’s multiple, repeated filings. That history has been documented in the numerous screening orders issued by the Court and the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Court’s orders accepting the Magistrate Judge’s prior screening orders, and the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge (“Report”). (Docket Nos. 16, 30, 45, 48, 67). The parties are familiar with that history, as is the Court, and it will not be repeated. As relevant here, before the Court are the following matters: (1) the Motion to Dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.