Brian T. Hill v. Ralph Diaz
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN T. HILL, Case No. CV 19-8989-MWF(JC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER (1) ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
13 v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE IN PART; (2) DENYING
14 JIM BONNIFIELD, et al., PLAINTIFF’S VARIOUS
REQUESTS; AND (3) DISMISSING
15 Defendants. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
16
17 18 The procedural history of this case is lengthy and somewhat complicated due 19 primarily to Plaintiff’s multiple, repeated filings. That history has been documented 20 in the numerous screening orders issued by the Court and the assigned Magistrate 21 Judge, the Court’s orders accepting the Magistrate Judge’s prior screening orders, and 22 the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge (“Report”). (Docket 23 Nos. 16, 30, 45, 48, 67). The parties are familiar with that history, as is the Court, and 24 it will not be repeated. 25 As relevant here, before the Court are the following matters: (1) the Motion to 26 Dismiss…