Yulin Guo v. David M. Radel

discussion.” Hagans v. Levine, 415 U.S. 528, 536 (1974) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). When a claim is not substantial, it is “so patently without merit that the claim requires no meaningful consideration.” Tijerino v. Stetson Desert Project, LLC, 934 F.3d 968, 975 (9th Cir. 2019). In the Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to include a jurisdictional statement and, as a result, failed to properly allege that this Court has jurisdiction over the Complaint. In addition, Plaintiff has failed to allege any legal basis or a sufficient factual basis for the relief requested. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than April 30, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint which corrects the defects noted above on or before April 30, 2024, the Court will consider that a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to…