Mario Anguiano Betancourt v. Glen E. Pratt
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARIO ANGUIANO BETANCOURT, Case No. :22-cv-02811-SB (SK)
Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION TO
GLEN E. PRATT, DISMISS HABEAS
Respondent. PETITION
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed thefi led Report and Recommendation to Dismiss HabeasP etition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. , 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction . Judgment will be entered accordingly dismissing this action without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 19, 2024
STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR.
United States District Judge