Mario Anguiano Betancourt v. Glen E. Pratt

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20242:22-cv-02811California147 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO ANGUIANO BETANCOURT, Case No. :22-cv-02811-SB (SK)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION TO

GLEN E. PRATT, DISMISS HABEAS

Respondent. PETITION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed thefi led Report and Recommendation to Dismiss HabeasP etition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. , 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction . Judgment will be entered accordingly dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 19, 2024

STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR.

United States District Judge