Taiwan Orran Reed v. Tammy L. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20245:24-cv-00796California1,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 24-0796 HDV (PVC) Date: April 22, 2024 Title Taiwan Orran Reed v. Tammy L. Campbell, Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS ACTION

BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE PETITION (1) IS NOT

PROPERLY VERIFIED; and (2) CONTAINS

UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS

On April 16, 2024, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding with counsel filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. No. 1). The Petition raises 12 grounds for relief. (Id. at 5–10). However, the Petition is subject to dismissal because it is not properly verified and Grounds 11 and 12 are unexhausted. A. The Petition Is Not Properly Verified. An “[a]pplication for a writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing signed and verified by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf.” 28 U.S.C. § 2242; see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.