Jorge Alejandro Pulido Colmenero v. James Robertson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORGE ALEJANDRO PULIDO Case No. CV ED 22-1215-DMG (GJS)

COLMENERO,

12 Petitioner ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES ROBERTSON, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas petition (“Petition” [Doc. # 1]), all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report” [Doc. # 20]), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report [Doc. # 21]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. For the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report do not warrant any change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Petitioner objects, in relation to Grounds One and Five…