Randy Quaid v. Craig Granet

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:23-cv-06850California1,772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-06850-MRA-JPR RANDY QUAID, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

CRAIG GRANET, et al., FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE 4(M) AND DENYING

Defendants. AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

TO DISMISS [ECF 25, 27]

17 18 Plaintiffs Randy Quaid and Evgenia Quaid commenced this action pro se by filing a complaint on August 18, 2023. (ECF 1). Plaintiffs name Craig Granet, Tony Davis, Reggie Serrano, James Hepsworth, R Scott Turicchi, Lannette Turicchi, Bruce Berman, Susan Williams, Fidelity National Title, Insurance Company, and Santa Barbara County as Defendants. Id. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants took part in a racketeering conspiracy to misuse a police database for the purpose of gaining an advantage in a civil case. Id. Plaintiffs bring a single claim under California Penal Code Section 11142, which makes it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.