Leotha Williamson v. DHL Global Forwarding USA

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20242:24-cv-01476California2,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LEOTHA WILLIAMSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-01476-WLH-BFM 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF LEOTHA WILLIAMSON’S MOTION TO v. R FEE EM SA [N 18D ] AND REQUEST FOR

DHL GLOBAL FORWARDING

USA; DANZAS CORPORATION;

DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.;

RAQUEL MEDINA; MONICA SUAREZ; and DOES 1 through 25, 17 Inclusive,

18 Defendant.

24 Before the Court is Plaintiff Leotha Williamson’s (“Williamson”) Motion to 25 Remand to Los Angeles Superior Court and Request for Fees. (Mot., Docket No. 18). 26 For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion but DENIES the request for 27 fees. 28 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background This case arises out of Williamson’s employment with Defendants DHL Global Forwarding USA; Danzas Corporation (“Danzas”); and DHL Express (USA), Inc. (collectively, the “Employer Defendants”). (Decl. of Lisa L. Peterson in Supp. of Removal, Exh. 1, Docket No. 6- (“Compl.”) ¶ 1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.