Jenell Rivera v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20242:23-cv-08723California1,460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 JENELL RIVERA, Case № 2:23-cv-08723-ODW (MRWx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 14 W AL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. et al., DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIFTH

CAUSE OF ACTION [26]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jenell Rivera brings this putative class action against Defendants Wal- 19 Mart Associates, Inc. and Sam’s West, Inc. for alleged violations of California labor 20 laws. (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), ECF No. 23.). Defendants now move to dismiss 21 Plaintiff’s fifth cause action for unfair and unlawful business practices in violation of 22 California Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. (Mot. Dismiss 23 (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 26.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS 24 Defendants’ Motion1 25 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.