Denise S. v. George Foreman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-09237-MEMF-PD DENISE S.,
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
CONSOLIDATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
v. [ECF NO. 34] 14 GEORGE FOREMAN, and DOES 2 through 50, 16 Defendants.
18 19 Before the Court is a Motion to Consolidate filed by Plaintiff Denise S. ECF No. 34. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Consolidate without prejudice. I. Background On August 24, 2022, Plaintiff Denise S. initiated this action in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, asserting claims against “Doe” defendants. ECF No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”). On October 26, 2022, Denise S. filed a First Amended Complaint, which substituted Defendant George Foreman for Doe 1. Id.; ECF No. 1-1 (“FAC”). The FAC alleges causes of action for (1) sexual battery and (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress, based on allegations that Foreman…