Unknown

Marcel Ford v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20242:21-cv-00088California909 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 MARCEL FORD, Case No. CV 21-0088-DMG (MAR) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNKNOWN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff Marcel Ford has objected. The Report recommends the denial of Ford’s Motions for Summary Judgment and the grant of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Ford’s objections to the Report do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. Ford objects that the grievance he filed on September 29, 2020, which preceded his being attacked by other inmates, was not accurately characterized. [Doc. # 205 at 2.] Specifically, Ford objects that it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.