Alexandro Garcia v. Lemonade Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20242:24-cv-01566California2,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A LEXANDRO GRACIA, an individual, C ase No. 2:24-cv-01566 SPG (PVCx) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 17]

v.

LEMONADE INSURANCE COMPANY,

14 a New York corporation; METROMILE

OPERATING COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and DOES 1 through 16 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff Alexandro Gracia’s motion to remand to the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. (ECF No. 17 (“Mot.”)). Defendant opposes. (ECF No. 19). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court finds that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L. R. 7.15. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion. 26 27 28 I. BACKGROUND AND PARTIES Plaintiff Alexandro Gracia (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendants Lemonade Insurance Company and Metromile Operating Company, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.