Howard Iten v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20242:21-cv-00486California2,840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD ITEN, ) Case No. CV 21-00486 DDP (JEMx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION ) TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ) COMPLAINT ) Defendant. ) [Dkt. 33] [JS-6] ___________________________ ) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Presently before the court for further consideration is Defendant County of Los Angeles (“the County”)’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Dkt. 33). Having considered the submissions of the parties and heard oral argument, the court grants the motion and adopts the following Order. I. Background As described in this Court’s prior Order (Dkt. 44), Plaintiff Howard Iten is part-owner of a commercially zoned property in the City of Lawndale, in Los Angeles county. (FAC ¶ 8.) Beginning in March 2020, the County imposed a moratorium on commercial tenant evictions for nonpayment of rent related to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.