Valor LLP v. Saeed Karamooz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20242:24-cv-02558California214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-02558-SPG-E Date May 6, 2024

Title Valor LLP v. Saeed Karamooz et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before May 20, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant Saeed Karamooz did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.