Albert Lee Mitchell v. Bryan Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20242:23-cv-10000California1,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT MITCHELL, Case Nos. CCVV 2233--1100000000 JJWWHH (MRW) Petitioner, CV 24-1415 JWH (MRW) v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTIONS

13 BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden, Respondent. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court dismisses these duplicative habeas actions based upon the failure of a pro se litigant to follow court orders or to update his address with the Court. 1. At the time of the commencement of these actions, Petitioner Mitchell was an inmate at the federal prison facility in Lompoc. He filed two habeas actions in this judicial district in late 2023 and early 2024. Both actions presented similar challenges to the existence of a detainer in Petitioner’s prison record and complained about retaliation from prison staff. 2. Following the commencement of the 2023 Action, Magistrate Judge Wilner issued a case management order that specifically informed Petitioner of his obligation under L.R. 41-6 to “keep the Court informed of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.