Albert Yum v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20248:24-cv-00861California525 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:24-cv-00861-DOC-PD Date: May 13, 2024
Title: ALBERT YUM V. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER SUA SPONTE
REMANDING CASE TO STATE
COURT
On the Court’s own motion, the Court hereby REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange.
Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on March 21, 2024. Dkt. 1 at 2. On April 19, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this Court. See generally Dkt. 1. Defendant asserted that the federal claims for relief against Experian in the state court action arose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq. and that the Court therefore has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 15 U.S.C. § 1681p.…