Albert Yum v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20248:24-cv-00861California525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-00861-DOC-PD Date: May 13, 2024

Title: ALBERT YUM V. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE

Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER SUA SPONTE

REMANDING CASE TO STATE

COURT

On the Court’s own motion, the Court hereby REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange.

Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on March 21, 2024. Dkt. 1 at 2. On April 19, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this Court. See generally Dkt. 1. Defendant asserted that the federal claims for relief against Experian in the state court action arose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq. and that the Court therefore has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 15 U.S.C. § 1681p.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.