Psa

Psa v. Port of Tacoma

Good Law
104 F.4th 95
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202421-35881California5,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER No. 21-35881

ALLIANCE,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:17-cv-05016-

BHS

v.

PORT OF TACOMA; SSA OPINION

TERMINALS LLC; SSA

TERMINALS (TACOMA), LLC,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

APM TERMINALS TACOMA LLC;

DON ESTERBROOK,

Defendants.

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER No. 21-35899

ALLIANCE,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-05016-

BHS

v. PORT OF TACOMA,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

SSA TERMINALS LLC; SSA

TERMINALS (TACOMA), LLC;

APM TERMINALS TACOMA LLC;

DON ESTERBROOK,

Defendants.

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER No. 22-35061

ALLIANCE,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-05016- v. BHS

SSA TERMINALS LLC; SSA

TERMINALS (TACOMA), LLC,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

PORT OF TACOMA; APM

TERMINALS TACOMA LLC; DON

ESTERBROOK,

Defendants.

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE V. PORT OF TACOMA

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2022 Submission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.