Psa
Psa v. Port of Tacoma
104 F.4th 95
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202421-35881California5,785 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER No. 21-35881
ALLIANCE,
D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:17-cv-05016-
BHS
v.
PORT OF TACOMA; SSA OPINION
TERMINALS LLC; SSA
TERMINALS (TACOMA), LLC,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
APM TERMINALS TACOMA LLC;
DON ESTERBROOK,
Defendants.
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER No. 21-35899
ALLIANCE,
D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-05016-
BHS
v. PORT OF TACOMA,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
SSA TERMINALS LLC; SSA
TERMINALS (TACOMA), LLC;
APM TERMINALS TACOMA LLC;
DON ESTERBROOK,
Defendants.
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER No. 22-35061
ALLIANCE,
D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-05016- v. BHS
SSA TERMINALS LLC; SSA
TERMINALS (TACOMA), LLC,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
PORT OF TACOMA; APM
TERMINALS TACOMA LLC; DON
ESTERBROOK,
Defendants.
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE V. PORT OF TACOMA
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding