Osemwingie
William Barker v. Osemwingie
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202423-15479California856 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 10 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM BARKER, No. 23-15479
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-03008-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
OSEMWINGIE; RAMISCAL,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Carolyn K. Delaney, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 5, 2024 San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: S.R. THOMAS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant William Barker appeals the district court’s screening
order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which dismissed Barker’s claims under Title
II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) against the State of California (“State”) for failure to
state a claim.1 We have…