Osemwingie

William Barker v. Osemwingie

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202423-15479California856 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 10 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM BARKER, No. 23-15479

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-03008-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

OSEMWINGIE; RAMISCAL,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

STATE OF CALIFORNIA;

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Carolyn K. Delaney, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 5, 2024 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: S.R. THOMAS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant William Barker appeals the district court’s screening

order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which dismissed Barker’s claims under Title

II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Section 504 of the

Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) against the State of California (“State”) for failure to

state a claim.1 We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.