Psa

Psa v. Port of Tacoma

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202421-35881California2,087 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, No. 21-35881

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05016-BHS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PORT OF TACOMA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

APM TERMINALS TACOMA LLC; DON

ESTERBROOK,

Defendants.

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, No. 21-35899

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05016-BHS

v.

PORT OF TACOMA,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. SSA TERMINALS LLC; et al.,

Defendants.

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, No. 22-35061

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05016-BHS

v.

SSA TERMINALS LLC; SSA TERMINALS

(TACOMA), LLC,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

PORT OF TACOMA; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2022 Submission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.