Psa
Psa v. Port of Tacoma
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202421-35881California2,087 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, No. 21-35881
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05016-BHS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PORT OF TACOMA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
APM TERMINALS TACOMA LLC; DON
ESTERBROOK,
Defendants.
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, No. 21-35899
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05016-BHS
v.
PORT OF TACOMA,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. SSA TERMINALS LLC; et al.,
Defendants.
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, No. 22-35061
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05016-BHS
v.
SSA TERMINALS LLC; SSA TERMINALS
(TACOMA), LLC,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
PORT OF TACOMA; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding