Frank Ventimiglia v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202423-35490California599 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 10 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK J. VENTIMIGLIA, No. 23-35490

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00084-TJC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Timothy J. Cavan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Frank Ventimiglia (Ventimiglia) appeals the district court’s order affirming

the denial of social security benefits by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “We review the district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of social

security benefits de novo, and will disturb the denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.