Miguel Castro v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202423-15841California1,956 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL CASTRO; TERESA CASTRO, No. 23-15841

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 5:22-cv-01829-VKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Virginia Kay DeMarchi, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 3, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.*** Concurrence by Judge BUMATAY

This appeal involves claims brought by Plaintiffs-Appellants Miguel and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Teresa Castro under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.