People v. Thomas CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 2024E079946California5,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2018, defendant and appellant Melinda Kay Thomas was convicted of one

count of attempted criminal threats (Pen. Code,1 §§ 644, 422, subd. (a); count 1); two

counts of possession of a firearm by a prohibited person (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); counts 2,

3) and one count of possession of ammunition by a prohibited person (§ 30305,

subd. (a)(1); count 4). In 2022, defendant petitioned to vacate her convictions pursuant to

newly enacted section 236.15, which generally permits the trial court to vacate a

conviction upon a showing that the conviction was the direct result of being a victim of

intimate partner violence or sexual violence. (§ 236.15, subd. (a).)

Defendant appeals from the denial of her petition, arguing: (1) the trial court’s

factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence; (2) the trial court erred by

utilizing incorrect evidentiary and legal standards beyond those specified in section

236.15; and (3) the matter should be remanded for full reconsideration of her petition in

light of amendments made to section 236.15 during the pendency of her appeal. We

conclude: (1) substantial evidence supports the trial court’s factual findings;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.