Snyder

Snyder v. Shoen CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2013A133083California9,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/28/13 Snyder v. Shoen CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

ROBERT A. SNYDER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A133083

v. PAUL F. SHOEN, (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. DR081047) Defendant and Appellant.

Paul F. Shoen appeals from a judgment granting Robert A. Snyder and Brenda Ford (respondents) a prescriptive easement over an eight-by-forty foot section of Shoen‟s property (the Easement Area). After a trial, the superior court ruled that respondents and their predecessors in interest had used the Easement Area for decades to obtain vehicular access to the garage located on what is now respondents‟ property. Finding that respondents had proved all the elements of a prescriptive easement by clear and convincing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.