United States v. Eduardo Lopez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202422-30148California1,091 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 22-30148; 22-30149
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:19-cr-00436-SI-43; 3:19-cr- v. 00509-SI-
EDUARDO BARBOSA LOPEZ, AKA
Barbas, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: RAWLINSON, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Eduardo Barbosa Lopez appeals the denial of two motions to suppress
evidence obtained from a phone wiretap and a search of his residence.
Alternatively, he argues that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing under Franks
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v.…