Leticia Faries v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202423-35280California780 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LETICIA R. FARIES, No. 23-35280

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00489-HZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 5, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Claimant Letica R. Faries appeals from the denial of her application for

disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

review the district court’s order de novo and reverse only if the Administrative Law

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge’s (ALJ) decision was not supported by substantial evidence or was based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.