Carson Bayness v. Martin O'Malley

Bad Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202423-35246California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARSON E. BAYNESS, No. 23-35246

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05227-MAT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Mary Alice Theiler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 5, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Claimant Carson E. Bayness appeals from the district court’s ruling affirming

the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for benefits. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s order de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo and reverse only if the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.