Carson Bayness v. Martin O'Malley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202423-35246California973 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARSON E. BAYNESS, No. 23-35246
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05227-MAT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Mary Alice Theiler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 5, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Claimant Carson E. Bayness appeals from the district court’s ruling affirming
the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for benefits. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s order de
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo and reverse only if the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision…