Amber Johnson v. Lamelo Ball
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 11 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMBER JOHNSON, an individual, No. 23-55520
Plaintiff, D.C. No. 2:22-CV-00884 v.
LAMELO BALL, an individual, MEMORANDUM* Defendant,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Alexander F. Mackinnon, Magistrate Judge
Argued and Submitted May 8, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, FORREST, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Amber Johnson (“Johnson”) appeals the district court’s
order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee LaMelo
Ball (“Ball”) on her finder’s fee claim arising from Ball’s endorsement contract with
Puma North America, Inc. (“Puma”). Johnson sued alleging she was owed a finder’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. fee for the Puma deal based on a claimed oral contract with Ball. The district court
granted Ball’s motion for partial summary judgment, holding that a…