Ansari

Ansari v. Haris CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2013A136932California1,627 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/28/13 Ansari v. Haris CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MUSTAFA ANSARI,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A136932

v. PAMELA HARRIS, as Director, etc., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG11599408) Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Mustafa Ansari appeals from an order denying his petition for writ of mandate in which he sought to compel the Employment Development Department (department) to restore unemployment insurance benefits he claims were wrongfully withheld. Ansari also challenges an order denying his motion for reconsideration and an order denying a motion to sanction the department‟s attorneys. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Ansari began receiving unemployment insurance benefits in 2008. In 2010, the department determined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.