Thomas Ward v. Commscope, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS ALLAN WARD, an individual, No. 23-55608
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00370-H-DEB v.
COMMSCOPE, INC., a Delaware MEMORANDUM* corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 7, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Ward appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial after
the district court entered judgment for Defendant CommScope, Inc. (CommScope),
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation.…