Thomas Ward v. Commscope, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202423-55608California1,260 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS ALLAN WARD, an individual, No. 23-55608

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00370-H-DEB v.

COMMSCOPE, INC., a Delaware MEMORANDUM* corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 7, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Plaintiff Thomas Ward appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial after

the district court entered judgment for Defendant CommScope, Inc. (CommScope),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.