Martinez Mendoza v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202421-743California838 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIGUEL MARTINEZ-MENDOZA, No. 21-743 Petitioner, A 205-699-994 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND,
Attorney General of the United States,
Respondent.
Petition for Review of an Order from the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 6, 2024** Portland, OR
Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Martinez-Mendoza petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary affirmance of the immigration judge’s (IJ)
denial of Martinez-Mendoza’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).
Where the BIA affirms an IJ’s order without opinion, we review the IJ’s order
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as the final agency action.…