Rodriguez Bailon v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202423-201California742 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARMENSITA RODRIGUEZ No. 23-201 BAILON; JORDAN ELIAS MARTIN Agency Nos. RODRIGUEZ, Jr.; DANA ESTEFANIA A208-778-557

MARTIN RODRIGUEZ, A208-778-558

A208-778-559

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 7, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Petitioner Carmensita Rodriguez Bailon and her two minor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.