People v. Montana CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 2024H049456California9,744 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural background On January 6, 2020, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a first amended information charging Montana with the following felonies: sodomy by use of an intoxicating, anesthetic, or controlled substance (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (i); count 1);2 sodomy by force (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)(A); count 2); oral copulation by use of an intoxicating, anesthetic, or controlled substance (§ 288a, subd. (i); count 3); oral copulation by force (§ 288a, subd. (c)(2); count 4); rape by use of an intoxicating, anesthetic, or controlled substance (§ 261, subd. (a)(3); count 5); rape of a victim unconscious of the nature of the act (§ 261, subd. (a)(4); count 6); and rape by force (§ 261, subd. (a)(2); count 7). A jury found Montana not guilty on count 6 (rape of a victim unconscious of the nature of act) but convicted him on all of the remaining counts. The trial court sentenced Montana to the lesser term of three years on count 2 (forcible sodomy), with concurrent separate three year terms on count 4 (forcible oral copulation) and count 7 (forcible rape). The court also imposed, but stayed pursuant to section 654, separate three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.