Jones

United States v. Jones

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202423-422California1,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-422 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:21-cr-00004-TMB-MMS-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

DUSTIN OLIVER JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 20, 2024 Anchorage, Alaska

Before: BYBEE, FRIEDLAND, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Dustin Jones appeals his convictions for possession with intent to distribute

controlled substances, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and being a felon in possession of a

firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291

and affirm.

1. Jones first challenges the lawfulness of his convictions on the theory that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. certain evidence of drug and firearm possession should have been suppressed

because it was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.