James Donoho v. Juddson Kirk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202423-55600California1,161 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES L. DONOHO, Naval Consolidated No. 23-55600 Brig Marine Corps Station Miramar 46141 Miramar Way, Suite 1 San Diego, California D.C. No. 92145, 3:20-cv-01362-RSH-BGS

Petitioner-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

JUDDSON M. KIRK, Commander (O-5) Commanding Officer Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar United States Navy,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Robert Steven Huie, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.