Acosta-Ochoa
Acosta-Ochoa v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202422-1464California595 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 13 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HECTOR ACOSTA-OCHOA, No. 22-1464
Petitioner, Agency No. A095-795-786
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 11, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: TASHIMA, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Hector Acosta-Ochoa seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals
(“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In reviewing denials of motions to reopen, this court applies the deferential
abuse of discretion standard. INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 107 (1988). Motions to
reopen are “disfavored in deportation proceedings” because “[t]here…