Cai

Cai v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202423-186California621 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NENGHUI CAI; HE SHAO QIN; XU No. 23-186 CAO, Agency Nos.

A213-131-639

Petitioners, A213-131-636

A213-131-635

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2024** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: CALLAHAN, HURWITZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Nenghui Cai1 petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal from an order by an Immigration Judge (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Cai’s true name is Nenghui Cao, but because the agency and the parties all refer to him as Cai, we do the same to minimize confusion. denying asylum and withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.