Ramirez Quinonez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202423-2556California542 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CANDELARIA RAMIREZ QUINONEZ; J. No. 23-2556 J. D.-R., Agency Nos.

A208-178-133

Petitioners, A208-178-134 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Candela Ramirez Quinonez and her minor son, both Guatemalan citizens,

seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of Ramirez Quinonez’s applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.