Ramirez Quinonez v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202423-2556California542 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CANDELARIA RAMIREZ QUINONEZ; J. No. 23-2556 J. D.-R., Agency Nos.
A208-178-133
Petitioners, A208-178-134 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 10, 2024**
Before: OWENS, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Candela Ramirez Quinonez and her minor son, both Guatemalan citizens,
seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order affirming the
Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of Ramirez Quinonez’s applications for asylum,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).