Wreston

(PC) Azdar v. Wreston

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20191:19-cv-01064California1,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR MARTINEZ AZDAR, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01064-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

WRESTON, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF

[ECF No. 8]

Plaintiff Victor Martinez Azdar is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed September 11, 2019. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.