Catherine
Catherine v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD CATHERINE, No. 2:19-cv-1487 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Donald Catherine is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on December 10, 2018, by filing a complaint in the Sacramento County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-2 at 3.1) Plaintiff is proceeding on an amended complaint. Therein, plaintiff alleges that “in or about October 2015, and ending in May 2018 the defendant Wells Fargo…