Pfeiffer

(PC) Trotter v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20191:18-cv-00259California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES TROTTER, Case No. 1:18-cv-00259-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR NEW TRIAL, REVIEW OF EVIDENCE,

v. IMMEDIATE RELEASE, BAIL RESTORED,

AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

WARDEN PFEIFFER, et al. (ECF No. 38) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff James Trotter is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for new trial, review of evidence, immediate release, bail restored, and appointment of counsel, filed on July 29, 2019. (ECF No. 38.) In his motion, Plaintiff asserts that he is being falsely imprisoned because he is actually innocent and the criminal judgment against him was obtained through a miscarriage of justice. Further, Plaintiff has provided the Court with documents related to the implementation of California’s nonviolent parole process for indeterminately sentenced …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.