Robertson

(HC) Dean v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20192:18-cv-01287California263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE’SHAWN DEAN, No. 2:18-cv-01287-TLN-GGH Petitioner, v. ORDER J. ROBERTSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 10, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.