(PS) Ortiz v. Client Services, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDREW R. ORTIZ and RENE ORTIZ, No. 2:18-cv-02396-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLIENT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. 15 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On April 23, 2019, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 22. Since that date, the undersigned has issued two orders to show cause why plaintiffs’ failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute. ECF Nos. 24, 27. Plaintiffs responded to the first show-cause order, requesting a continuance so that they could attempt to resolve the matter out of court. ECF No. 25. The court granted them an additional 30 days to file an amended complaint, warning that a failure to amend may result in a dismissal…