Plummer

Plummer v. The Way Forward Foundation CA2/5

Bad Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2024B322271California2,749 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lee, J.

Filed 6/13/24 Plummer v. The Way Forward Foundation CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

MICHAEL E. PLUMMER B322271

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV07516) v.

THE WAY FORWARD

FOUNDATION et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Malcolm H. Mackey, Judge. Dismissed. Law Offices of Ephraim O. Obi and Ephraim O. Obi for Defendants and Appellants. Lipeles Law Group, Kevin A. Lipeles, Thomas H. Schelly, and Julian Bellenghi for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________ Defendants and appellants The Way Forward Foundation and Kimberly Benard1 (collectively, Way Forward) purport to appeal the denial of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.