In re S.B. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant E.B. (Father) is the father of S.B., a daughter born in July
2016. Father appeals from the juvenile court’s August 15, 2023
jurisdictional/dispositional orders adjudicating S.B. a dependent of the court (Welf. & 1 Inst. Code, § 300, subds. (b), (g)), removing S.B. from parental custody (§ 361, subd.
(c)(1)), and ordering Father to complete a domestic violence program, among other 2 services. Father requests this court’s review of only a portion of the jurisdictional
allegation pertaining to his conduct even though independent, unchallenged grounds exist
for the court’s dependency jurisdiction over the child based on Mother’s conduct. Father
claims insufficient evidence supports the court’s jurisdictional finding against him and
that the court abused its discretion in requiring him to complete a domestic violence
program. We conclude insufficient evidence supports the one jurisdictional finding
against Father and reverse the jurisdictional and dispositional orders as to Father, but
affirm the court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders as to Mother.
1 All future statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code…