Brown

(PC) Lopez v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20191:17-cv-00343California3,555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM R. LOPEZ, 1:17-cv-00343-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

vs. REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL BE DENIED, AND THAT THIS

DR. BROWN, et al., CASE BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE,

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF No. 21.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND Adam R. Lopez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 9, 2017, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) On April 3, 2018, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 12.) On June 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 15.) On October 15, 2018, the court dismissed the First Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.