Rodreguez

(PC) Harrison v. Rodreguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20191:18-cv-00525California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL F. HARRISON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00525-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

v. PREJUDICE, FED. R. CIV. P. 41 RODREGUEZ, (Docs. 52) Defendant. CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

17 On August 1, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41(a)(1)(A), in relevant part, reads:

20 the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 21 summary judgment; (ii) a stipulated dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 22 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties who have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.