(SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20192:14-cv-00851California1,374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARON KAY CLARK, No. 2:14-cv-00851 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL,1 Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff brought this action seeking judicial review of a final administrative decision denying an application for Supplemental Security Income under Title II of the Social Security Act. By order filed March 9, 2016, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was granted, the decision of the Commissioner was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.3 (ECF No. 19.) //// 24 Andrew M. Saul is substituted as defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

Both parties have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action 26 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF Nos. 8 & 10.) 27 On August 3, 2016, the action was reassigned from the previously assigned Magistrate Judge to the undersigned. (ECF No. 25.) On March 21, 2019, counsel for plaintiff filed a motion for an award…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.